The Lives of Three Dying Playfish Games

Late last month, Playfish announced on its forums that due to poor performance in Pirates Ahoy, Poker Rivals and Gangster City, the developer would be taking the titles offline on Tuesday, June 7, 2011. A study of these three games’ life cycles characterizes the challenges of killing off a social game built into a larger developer ecosystem.

Note: Lifetime data was collected from our application and social game traffic tracking service, AppData. To view these numbers for yourself or any traffic information beyond the current 30-day period, sign up for AppData Pro.

Pirates Ahoy, July 2010 – June 2011

MAU Today: 267,000Hello There
DAU Today: 40,000

Pirates Ahoy is a combination treasure hunting and city building game where players take the roll of a pirate plundering the high seas for goods that can then be spent on building up a pirate cove. The game took about three months to hit its stride with users, reaching an all-time high of 6.8 million MAU and 806,000 DAU between August and September 2010. After that point, the game declined more rapidly than Poker Rivals or Gangster City, but stayed relatively sticky among its small audience with a 15% to 20% ratio of DAU over MAU after its peak months ended.

Poker Rivals, November 2009 – June 2011

MAU Today: 91,000Avatar Goods
DAU Today: 12,000

Poker Rivals was Playfish’s answer to Zynga’s Texas HoldEm Poker, only with avatar customization as a variation to the formula. The game hit its stride very early with all-time highs of 1.5 million MAU and 130,000 DAU in December and January and then declined gradually with post-peak DAU to MAU ratio hovering around 13%. Interestingly, Poker Rivals seemed to attract a female audience why Texas HoldEm Poker’s audience remains largely male.

Gangster City, January 2010 – June 2011

MAU Today: 88,000Hotwired
DAU Today: 7,000

Gangster City also seems to be Playfish’s answer to Zynga game Mafia Wars, but the quality of animation, voice over work, and polish created a completely different player experience. By the numbers, Gangster City hit its high of 2.6 million MAU and 322,000 DAU in the first three months and declined a little bit faster than Poker Rivals over the rest of its life. The post-peak DAU to MAU ratio hovers between 8% and 10%.

Why did they fail?

While the critical response to each of these games was initially positive, a reasonable person can concluded that none of these games found a large enough, or dedicated enough audience to sustain the games over time. There may be several reasons for that on the gameplay side, but that would be to difficult to quantify in a way that produces constructive analysis. Instead, we look at the factors we can see — that two of these games were incredibly similar to popular Zynga titles and that one of them came out three years after North America’s pop culture obsession with pirates had largely died off. So either Playfish found itself in direct competition for an audience, or the audience was already declining when the game launched.

What can we learn?

Given the long life each of these titles enjoyed and Playfish’s continuing success through its other games, it seems like we can draw three conclusions. First, social games don’t last forever no matter how well-designed they may be. Developers tend to build products that the hope will last indefinitely, but according to research published in Inside Virtual Goods: The Future of Social Gaming 2011, engaged users only play game for about two months before moving on. If a developer isn’t bringing new users into a game to replace them or attracting old users back either with content iterations or marketing campaigns, the decline continues and a developer reaches a point where it’s not financially reasonable to maintain a game that isn’t making money.

Second, we can draw the conclusion that consistent currency across all games in a network makes transitions from closing games to thriving games smoother. All Playfish games use Playfish Cash, so it’s easy for customers in these three dying games to take their existing balances to other Playfish games. We expect that with the launch of Facebook Credits, these game-to-game transitions will only get smoother — so smooth, in fact, that developers may find themselves adding item incentives within their own thriving games to keep customers from taking their Facebook Credits to a different developer’s game. This seems to be what Playfish is trying to do by inserting a pop-up into the closing games that invites users to join Monopoly Millionaires with a free gift item as a reward for switching over.

This is where our third conclusion comes in: developers should be aware of the similarities and difference in their games enough to suggest and appropriate “replacement” games for users grieving the loss of their favorite game. It’s probably impossible to find a perfect replacement with the same gameplay mechanics, genre, and style; but within a developer’s network, there ought to be at least one game with enough similarities to appeal to an existing user about to lose their game. Developers should go the extra mile to match these users to replacement games and perhaps let them choose which game they want to migrate to for a bonus item.

For example, right now a Pirates Ahoy user could take their Playfish Cash to My Empire because the games feature similar art styles both in-game and in the cross-promotion bar for Playfish games. This player may adjust well to the game because both feature city-building mechanics. However, the Monopoly Millionaires prompt is trying to direct them to a completely different gameplay experience than what they’re used to with the promise of a free item. It’s jarring and it compromises the user’s ability to choose their “replacement” game from among the rest of Playfish’s titles.

You can find out more about Playfish’s existing titles on AppData.

Mediabistro Job Fair

Mediabistro Event

Mediabistro Job Fair

Join us on January 27 at the Altman Building in New York City for an incredible opportunity to meet with hiring managers from the top New York media companies, network with other professionals and industry leaders, and land your next job! Register now!


Leave a Reply

11 Responses to “The Lives of Three Dying Playfish Games”

  1. Henric Suuronen says:

    You can check on quora on my views on why Pirates Ahoy failed:

  2. Ryan says:

    I find this article extremely disappointing. What started as a great headline ended up as little beyond AppData statistics, a link to your Virtual Goods report and some screenshots. Comment from the developer would have been a great place to start (see Game Developer Magazine postmortems for reference), as would some graphs to show us the change in traffic at important points during all (or part of) each game’s life cycle.

    For a website tracking the social games industry, I expected more thoughtful conclusions and analysis. The game didn’t find enough players? Social games don’t last forever? Hrm, ok. Shared currency across games makes it easier to transition across products? Well, yeah. Developers should be aware of the similarities and differences in their games to suggest a replacement? Ohhhkay…

    One of the things you guys talk so much about is your AppData service. Consider sharing some numbers with us to show why you’re knowledgeable in this industry or an insightful quote from someone working in the business. What I saw here was little beyond a news tidbit from the Playfish forums and data I could gather myself by going to AppData.

    I visit your site regularly and find the articles interesting but this one in particular left me scratching my head.

  3. Ric Moore says:

    Gangster City was badly executed. They ripped off Mob/Mafia Wars but instead of just clicking ‘do job’ and a progress bar moving they added an animation. You still have to click ‘do job’ thousands of times but it’s made more tedious by a repetitive animation = much worse user experience.
    They should have made it like Crime City instead.

  4. AJ Glasser says:

    Sorry that you feel that way, Ryan, but the data provided in this article actually isn’t available to public users on AppData. Traffic cycle information would’ve taken you back only about a month, which wouldn’t be fair context for these games as they’re all over a year old.

    More importantly, this article is not a postmortem for these games a la Game Developer Magazine. It’s a look at the traffic life cycles, which is only one facet of a social game’s existence. For an effective reasoning for each game’s demise, someone would’ve had to have been there the whole time — and regrettably, nobody at ISG maintained play in any of these games beyond a month (which could tells us something in itself about the games’ long-term potential) — and then gone to the developer for an in-depth interview of what worked and didn’t work in gameplay that could be used as context for the games’ decline. As it is, all we can do is look at the core gameplay, look at the numbers, and draw reasonable conclusions.

    Lastly, Playfish made its reasoning for closing these titles perfectly clear in the forum posts. No need to harass the developer for information already made public.

    Thanks for reading.

  5. William G says:

    “data provided in this article actually isn’t available to public users”

    Is this a real article or a commercial for a THOUSAND DOLLAR PDF file? That’s rather expensive, isn’t it? Isn’t it just a list of data points anyone can collect for free from facebook? I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume there are 5000 pages of world-class analysis thrown in.

  6. Frank says:

    Besides, the Game Developer Magazine postmortems are little more than a pat in the back. I’ve read them since eternity, and in the history of GDM there’s been only two postmortems that are actually that – people telling what went seriously wrong and why and I think one or both of those articles never even made it to the magazine because they were just too honest. Scans are online.

    Other than that, the GDM postmortems are mostly just stating the obvious and concentrate more on the what went right -section anyway.

    The suggestions for the failure by Henric are all nice and fine, but also pretty light. I’d be absolutely amazed if the Playfish team didn’t think of all of those issues when they developed the game and there’s a few red flags there anyway. Personally, I think there’s just a trust and responsibility issue inside Playfish and they don’t let some of their guys do their jobs.

  7. PlayFish to close three games says:

    [...] Inside Social Games reports Pirates Ahoy, Poker Rivals and Gangster City will close in June. [...]

  8. Playfish Taps Ex-Planet Moon Studios CEO For Studio General Manager says:

    [...] Playfish moves toward expansion, the developer is sunsetting three of its older titles and ramping up development on Monopoly Millionaires. To date, the game has 6.2 million monthly [...]

  9. PlayFish to close three games | VG247 says:

    [...] Inside Social Games reports Pirates Ahoy, Poker Rivals and Gangster City will close in June. [...]

  10. DNA Games Sunsets Casino City, Bar World and Slot City on Facebook Following Zynga Acquisition says:

    [...] DNA Games continued along a sunsetting strategy we’ve seen with Playfish and PlayFirst, we could’ve expected it to migrate Casino City users to Slot City as development [...]

  11. Inside Social Games · EA Q2 FY12 Digital Revenue Up 45% says:

    [...] for a sixth consecutive quarter. EA acquired the Restaurant City developer in late 2009 and since sunsetted several of its older titles in favor of developing Facebook games around EA’s core brands [...]

Get the latest news in your inbox
interested in advertising with inside social games?

Social Media Jobs
of the Day

Social Media Specialist

Kensington Publishing Corp.
New York, NY

Web & Social Media Analyst

Chicago, IL

Interactive Marketing Manager

Phoenix, AZ

Communications Specialist

Humanscale Corporation
New York, NY

Engagement Editor

The Center for Public Integrity
Washington, DC

Featured Company

Join leading companies like this one and recruit from the nation's top media job seekers on the Mediabistro Job Board. Every job post comes with our satisfaction guarantee. Learn More

Our Sponsors

Mediabistro A division of Prometheus Global Media home | site map | advertising/sponsorships | careers | contact us | help courses | browse jobs | freelancers | content | member benefits | reprints & permissions terms of use | privacy policy Copyright © 2014 Mediabistro Inc. call (212) 389-2000 or email us