The Case Against Facebook Credits

[Editor's note: This interview with Jambool CEO Vikas Gupta is a companion piece to another published immediately after it, The Case For Facebook Credits.]

Since Facebook first launched Credits, its own in-game virtual currency, for externally developed applications in May of 2009, app developers have been worried about the potential the hefty 30 percent fee Facebook charges for the currency and the potential that it might enforce their use for all apps.

But another group had been watching, and worrying about, Credits for much longer: payment and monetization companies. If Credits are made mandatory across Facebook, a whole swathe of payment companies started on the platform will be at risk.

One of those companies is Jambool, which was founded by two former payment executives. Despite the threat from Credits, Jambool is still hard at work with its Social Gold payment platform on Facebook and elsewhere; this morning, in fact, it’s releasing a significant update to its inventory management, Flash payment, analytics and other features.

However, CEO and co-founder Vikas Gupta has also made no secret of his opposition to Credits. Below, we interview Gupta to get an in-depth look at his arguments against the currency.

Note that some of the arguments below assume specific policies and actions from Facebook that the company has not yet made clear; we covered many of these uncertainties in our own June article.

Inside Social Games: You’ve said that you’re not completely against Credits.

Vikas Gupta: I think there are definitely some advantages to Credits, that we believe in and have always believed in. For example, I believe Credits as a store value system makes sense for certain kinds of purchases. Credits also does well at eliminating the need for a developer to have multiple different currencies around the world.

The third thing they have as an advantage is that more consumers would have trust and loyalty to Facebook with Credits. How much of an additional benefit that will have is the question, but it’s definitely an intangible benefit that we see Credits could bring. And from the user’s point of view there’s an advantage in being able to use their Credits across multiple applications.

ISG: OK, now let’s talk about the downsides. What’s the big picture?

VG: There are definitely cons to Facebook Credits as a universal currency. The first one is the way many of these games work — they’re mini-economies of their own. If you look at games like FarmVille, the currency is an integral part of the game.

Facebook has been saying that Credits will work like the Euro, which works across the European economies, but we believe that’s very wrong. Credits is a stored value system — the only people who participate are those who purchase credits.

Right now there are only 1-2 percent who will spend money to buy goods in a game. That’s a big distinction between this and a true economy. In a true economy it should be in the hands of 50-60 percent of the people. Facebook hasn’t seeded credits through its own platform — it is relying on the applications to help spread their adoption.

They have experimented with Credits on their site but we haven’t seen any of those experiments succeed — for example, they’ve even shut down the gift store. Developers are helping Facebook build the Credits, and it is evolving into a pre-paid stored value system, that as we discussed sits in the hands of a small percentage of the user base.

Facebook Credits doesn’t really work like the Euro — the applications do not contribute to the currency. As an example, problems in Greece’s economy resulted in the entire Euro being affected. However, any one application on the Facebook platform cannot disrupt Credits or any other application. Instead of a universal currency, it works as a stored value system — where users can buy credits from Facebook and spend it in applications.

ISG: What’s the difference between a real currency and what Facebook is doing, then?

VG: One example of a real currency is a [Second Life] Linden Dollar. It has many aspects in which it works like a real currency, there’s a lot more transparency into where people get it and what people can do with it. The Linden Dollar did not need an external ecosystem to build it — it evolved amongst its users and content. The way Credits work is more like prepaid cards. So how many people would buy prepaid cards anywhere?

Pre-paid systems have traditionally had limited success. They’ve had lower conversion and lower adoption because people have to commit to buying more up front, even though they don’t know how much they’ll spend or in what amounts. That leads to breakage. An example is Amazon gift certificates — you could  buy them but there’s always a large amount of remnant value on the card that isn’t used. In an economy like this platform, that will lead to developers never seeing the value even though they created it.

ISG: Let’s move on to other potential problems with Credits.

VG: The second thing that has come up a lot is the fee. There’s a 30 percent fee, and this is the first time ever on the web that someone has taken such a high a fee for payments. People have taken that fee on closed platforms, but on the web it’s the first time. And when you add in things like breakage, it’s more like 50 percent.

And fraud is a very serious issue with Facebook. It’s not that fraud gets built into the 30 percent, and Facebook won’t issue money back to developers. The assumption is that Facebook is giving the Credits earnings to the game even if they’re generated from fraud. What we’re hearing is that’s not what’s happening. If the money came from fraud it never makes it to the game developer.

ISG: Let’s talk about some of these points in more depth, starting with the last. Isn’t fraud already a problem for developers?

VG: When I am building my game and people are buying my currency, I see the complete process end to end. When I see fraud, it affects me and I can manage and control that. But when people are coming through an intermediate step, it’s very difficult to figure out who perpetrated the fraud and how it affects any game using Credits.

ISG: So transparency is a problem in fraud. Is it also a problem elsewhere?

VG: When a user is playing my game, the user comes in and spends maybe $10. I know the fact that they spent $10, and that’s how much currency I’m giving away. When it comes to using a third party system, I don’t know what they spent overall, there’s just what they spent in my game. I don’t know how much the user could have spent in the game.

When the user spends $10 today I can actually change the game experience to get the gamer to spend all that currency in the game. I can’t do that as effectively when only Facebook knows how much they spent. That’s a bigger issue when, at the end of the month, you get paid and you don’t know anything about the users. It’s more effective when developers can see the end-to-end flow of money.

ISG: You brought up breakage. What are the issues around that?

VG: Right now, when a user knows they have money that can be spent across games, they’ll become very cautious about where they spend the money. There was a promotion in Hello City, in which they gave away 5 Credits. I got them, and never spent them — they’re in my account today. That’s because I know that I can spend it anywhere.

The thing with virtual currency is that it should feel very cheap. Now you have this system of currency that you can spend in other places, so users are perceiving value in it, and they don’t want to spend it as easily in a particular game. Users will be very cautious about where they actually spend the money, because they have the option to spend it on other games, not just the game they’re playing right now.

A less obvious problem is that on Facebook there have been a lot of similar games being built, farming games and so forth. In any genre there are multiple titles. For users there have been high switching costs, because a user who couldn’t switch their currency couldn’t move. Now you can have a game that convinced the user to spend money on virtual currency, but the user can take it elsewhere. The switching costs with currency, especially, have gone down. Can games keep users engaged, or can other developers take the users away along with the money they got them to spend?

ISG: Is Facebook justified in charging 30 percent?

VG: There has never been a precedent where someone took 30 percent on the web purely for payments. If it was done in a way that developers saw value, or if it was really cheap and easy, it would be understandable. But I think that we all know at this point that Facebook is not that straightforward for distribution — we all have to spend money on distribution. So you’re not just paying 30 percent for payments, you have to spend on top of that for advertising. If all I was doing was spending for distribution, it would be a lot easier, you’d have that extra 25 percent margin.

A big difference between Facebook and Apple or Microsoft is that there’s no other distribution channel other than Facebook itself. On the Xbox, if I’m building a game, I’m selling directly to users in the retail channel, and the distribution channel is up to me; the viral channels are not dependent on Microsoft. But here’s a platform that I’m dependent on for distribution as well as monetization — that’s a problem.

I believe we’ll start seeing that there will be a lack of motivation for people to build on Facebook. That’s a big thing we’ve seen in the last few months, that every developer is much more excited about building for off-Facebook distribution.

[Ed. note: To move on to the case for Facebook credits, click here.]

Mediabistro Job Fair

Mediabistro Event

Mediabistro Job Fair

Join us on January 27 at the Altman Building in New York City for an incredible opportunity to meet with hiring managers from the top New York media companies, network with other professionals and industry leaders, and land your next job! Register now!


Leave a Reply

16 Responses to “The Case Against Facebook Credits”

  1. The Case For Facebook Credits says:

    [...] CrowdStar chairman Peter Relan is a companion piece to another published immediately before it, The Case Against Facebook Credits.] Among the many developers that have now tested out or exclusively adopted Facebook Credits, none [...]

  2. Game Geek Speak » Blog Archive » Facebook credits as virtual currency, or not? says:

    [...] is a really interesting article on Inside Social Games that cautions against using Facebook Credits as a payment method. This is something that I’m trying to reason through in regards to my [...]

  3. Juliette says:

    The fraud is an interesting one. I would have thought from that huge 30% cut they would manage fraud themselves and use that large cut to work at reducing it’s incidence investing in detection and pattern finding, etc. Instead they have actually put an extra barrier inbetween the seller and buyer in terms of detection.

    I don’t like the way Facebook is cutting down on freedom (if they do go the full distance and make credits the only option) or charging such a draconian fee. Credits should be able to stand up on it’s own two feet. Developers will flock to credits if it has significantly added value that covers the 30% fee.

    Facebook is buying-off the current developers with exclusive temporary tie in deals (presumably with perks such as reduced fees) as well as giving away free currency only makes the thing attractive in the short term and suggests Facebook themselves know this is just a gold grab and the idea of adding value is over-hyped.

    Perhaps Facebook want the money PayPal are getting (except 30% instead of around 3.5%!), and when they’ve got everybody stitched up they’ll close the door and everybody is tied in. Smaller margins on games may make Facebook a less attractive proposition for the small up and coming developers which have flourished and made many household names on the site. I hope I’m proved wrong.

  4. Wooga Becomes the Fourth Large Developer to Use Facebook Credits Exclusively says:

    [...] of the issues around the virtual currency and our interviews with industry leaders on the pros and cons of Credits, over on Inside Social games. To dig deeper into the social gaming market, check out [...]

  5. Report: Google Buying Virtual Payments Provider Jambool for around $75 Million says:

    [...] approach has been to argue publicly against Facebook’s idea of Credits — see this recent guest post from cofounder Vikas Gupta for more on that — and to expand with other partners. One of those partners is MySpace, also [...]

  6. Googleの対Facebook戦略の次の一手―ソーシャル決済のJamboolを$70Mで買収 says:

    [...] 他のソーシャル決済サービスと同様、JaboolもFacebook Creditsのローンチで大きな打撃を受けていた。実際、最近GuptaはFacebook Creditsについて愚痴をこぼしていた。 [...]

  7. דיווח: גוגל לא עוצרת, רוכשת את ג'אמבול | Newsgeek says:

    [...] ישיר של נקודות הקרדיט של פייסבוק, וממייסדי ג'אמבול העבירו ביקורת פומבית על השתלטות פייסבוק על אמצעי התשלום הווירטואליים ברשת [...]

  8. Google Siap-siap Akuisisi Jambool | DailySocial says:

    [...] disisi lain, CEO dan co-founder Jambool Vikas Gupta menjadi salah satu orang yang  mengkritik kebijakan yang ada di Facebook Credits, salah satunya karena pungutan yang diambil Facebook sebesar [...]

  9. Google to Move up Social Ladder with Jambool Purchase | Komplett Blog says:

    [...] has raised $6 million in funding before now, and it should be noted that the former has some pretty strong views on the merits of Facebook Credits, so he should be a motivated ally if Google choose to use [...]

  10. Google’s Appetite For Small Companies Still Unsatisfied - TechnoBuffalo says:

    [...] Google Checkout, so why would they need a payment tool that is so specific?  Especially one that the CEO of the company went on a rant about Facebook Credits a while back?  Sounds like a company that would work well with the recently purchased Slide, to [...]

  11. What Will Google Do With Virtual Currency? Keep it Open | thechromesource - Google Chrome and Chrome OS News and Resources says:

    [...] fact, the CEO of Jambool recently was interviewed in a blog post about the possible problems with Facebook Credits. One is the idea that Credits is not really a currency but more of a stored value amount – [...]

  12. Google Siap-siap Akuisisi Jambool | Iconmob Indonesia says:

    [...] disisi lain, CEO dan co-founder Jambool Vikas Gupta menjadi salah satu orang yang  mengkritik kebijakan yang ada di Facebook Credits, salah satunya karena pungutan yang diambil Facebook sebesar [...]

  13. Jambool Confirms that It Has Been Bought by Google says:

    [...] Like other companies in the same space, Jambool has been getting squeezed out of Facebook as that company introduces its own virtual currency, Credits. Gupta responded at length to Facebook’s aggressive introduction of Credits in a lengthy interview with us last month. [...]

  14. Zynga Switches to Exclusively Use Credits in Its Facebook Games says:

    [...] The Case Against Facebook Credits [...]

  15. Toward an FB credits event horizon? The politics of a one-stop currency….. | says:

    [...] This year we’ve seen a trend toward social games adopting Facebook Credits as standard currency. This can increase the liquidity of transactions online (say, when moving from one game to another) and arguably create a larger market for developers (as users are less trapped by the currency they hold within one game – and, they can use one currency across all territories). Security (or perceived security, and it’s corollary, customer confidence in the currency – policed and backed by the golden seal of Facebook!) may follow. The flipside, of course, is that Facebook becomes even more all-pervasive in this medium (and takes 30%!!!) – and that there are other issues that may impact negatively on developers and end users. [...]

  16. nancybeauford says:

    i have brought folks on facebook as friends yet i dont have any credits for friends to help in my game i have friends join me on cityvill treasure island frontervill teki island and i still dont have credits to grow you need friends why dont i grt credit to grow i am getting tired of asking friends on to face book and playing games can you fix this problum soon?

Get the latest news in your inbox
interested in advertising with inside social games?

Social Media Jobs
of the Day

Social Media Manager

Social Media Manager
Santa Monica, CA

Social Media Manager

Honest Tea, Inc.
Bethesda, MD

Product Manager - Community Platform

Maker Media
San Francisco, CA

Featured Company

Join leading companies like this one and recruit from the nation's top media job seekers on the Mediabistro Job Board. Every job post comes with our satisfaction guarantee. Learn More

Our Sponsors

Mediabistro A division of Prometheus Global Media home | site map | advertising/sponsorships | careers | contact us | help courses | browse jobs | freelancers | content | member benefits | reprints & permissions terms of use | privacy policy Copyright © 2014 Mediabistro Inc. call (212) 389-2000 or email us