Zynga’s Confusing Deal Terms Result in Acquisitions, Padding in Case of Hard Times

Zynga has been assembling a big cash hoard in the last year. Between the $180 million it said it raised in December from a consortium led by Digital Sky Technologies, and $147 million that it has not confirmed it has raised from SoftBank, the company could have something like $327 million in new funding.

Except it doesn’t, according to a string of deal terms pieced together over the last year by finance data company VC Experts. Here’s a quick look at what data we have available, and what it might mean; note that Zynga has steadfastly not commented on any of its funding moves in years, aside from announcing the DST deal.

Up until last fall, Zynga had a pretty typical-looking set of filings: when it raised money, the company would authorize stock and sell it as you’d expect, with filings showing up afterward.

The situation got stranger in mid-November, when a regulatory “Form D” filing showed up stating that the company had raised $15.2 million from previous investors as an extension to its second round of funding from back in 2008. A reliable source had told us in the spring of 2009 that the company was raising around this amount of money, but that was never confirmed. The filing that appeared last November may have actually been raised then, and just filed later — more on this, further down.

Then the DST deal got announced in December. That $180 million stock purchase by investors has never shown up in a regulatory filing — at least not all at once, and not yet. Instead, there has been a trickle of stock authorizations and small stock sales, beginning in late April of this year.

[Editor's note: Full copies of the filings and more details are available on VC Experts' Valuation & Deal Term Database.]

The most notable recent filing happened on May 11th, when the company authorized new shares of class “Series B-2″ preferred stock; when valued at the latest share price, the value of this class increased from around $25 million to $315 million. Preferred stock is intended for investors, often connected to strategic partnership agreements or other deals. The amount is also just $13 million less than the combined DST and SoftBank funding.

This filing could represent the majority of the stock that DST and SoftBank are getting, meaning Zynga delayed any filings related to DST from last December through when it finalized SoftBank’s deal. There are other complications, to this idea, though.

The company also made a few much smaller adjustments and added smaller new stock classes to its capitalization table in the past few months. Some of these may have had to do with recent acquisitions, including Challenge Games and XPD Media. The big new investors may also be getting other types of stock, which helps explain the difference between the $315 million worth of B-2 shares and the combined $327 million of the latest investment. A third complication is that Zynga may be issuing more stock for employees that it does not bring in through acquisitions, but rather because of individual hires or compensation package increases. Finally, it could be that DST and/or SoftBank have some sort of “subscription agreement,” where they agree to buy stock over a period of time at agreed-upon terms.

The bigger question is why the filings are happening this way. Authorizations, stock purchases and announcements about new investors normally happen within a month or three of each other, and investor data services, finance news publications and competitors track them closely to try to understand what hot companies are doing.

Zynga’s unusual approach, while not unheard of, is likely because the company has wanted to tightly control what everyone else knew about its strategies. For example, it launched what became its biggest hit, farm simulation FarmVille, in June of 2009. By this point it already had figured out how to get a solid return on investment in Facebook’s performance advertising system — well before most other developers had. By delaying that funding until many months later, it may have helped hide its intense focus on launching FarmVille until after the game had gotten going. Then, by delaying filings related to DST, the company was able to obscure the fact that it was doubling down on its business even as many other social gaming competitors raised smaller amounts or sold.

This interpretation is, to be clear, speculation based on possibly incomplete filings and an unusual and drawn-out process. If there is any clear takeaway here, it is that Zynga is willing to keep raising the stakes even as its traffic on its core platform, Facebook, has ebbed, and as it has faced new monetization changes like Facebook Credits. And it’s raising the stakes in ways that potentially confuse the rest of the market.

While Zynga has had some successful new games this year, like Treasure Isle and now FrontierVille, it faces a slow-growing, increasingly expensive Facebook platform, and risky or inadequate alternatives. The new money does not look like it’s just going towards more growth, but also towards a more mature and challenging period for social gaming. The long-term goal is still, we assume, for Zynga to go public eventually.

AppData - Facebook application stats and data from Inside Network

9 Responses to Zynga’s Confusing Deal Terms Result in Acquisitions, Padding in Case of Hard Times

  1. Byron says:

    Wow, talk about overspeculation! As usual, the simplest explanation is quite often the correct one. Their slow filings have nothing to do with business strategy and everything to do with lazy/slow legal counsel. And who says zynga needs to go public. It’s already too late for them anyway, with their numbers declining as fast as they are I don’t see how any investor could safely put their money in zynga stock. I know I sure as hell wouldn’t as it’s extremely overvalued right now even without taking their declines into account.

  2. Eric Eldon says:

    Byron, I did a lot of careful research for this article. What supporting evidence do you have?

  3. Byron says:

    Personal experience with their legal team.

  4. Blaze@gmail.com says:

    How about the more likely possibility.. Zynga is exagerating the deAl terms.. funding is based on long term milestones. None of which have been met.

    Kind of like they’ll get the other 90% of the money when they grow by 10x

    but of course you don’t announce that … You announce the total deal

  5. Eric Eldon says:

    Byron, can you share any more about your experience, and how it relates to Zynga’s filings? Did you actually engage with Zynga and meet their legal team that way, or do you just know lawyers who work for them, and so you’re assuming the rest from there?

    Blaze, it’s certainly possible that there’s some sort of “subscription agreement” or similar deal, like I mentioned in the article.

  6. powerpop says:

    Good speculation Eric. I also have personal experience with Zynga (sold what became Farmville to them) and Pincus tightly controls every aspect of who has shares and wants as little known externally about their funding status. He is generally an extremely controlling business leader. It looks like this strategy is paying off for him as he has no trouble raising capital, buying small development houses and copying successful emerging games. Zynga has a very interesting playbook that it has executed on flawlessly.

  7. Jason says:

    @powerpop..

    Except the fatal flaw being the very thing that is driving it’s success.. 280M MAU users in December 2009, now around 210M MAU .. It’s no surprise that users are sick and tired of Zynga’s constant spam tactics to grow virally.. It also amazes me that with the 300+ developers they have.. they can’t produce an new / innovative game.. Every single game they have developed.. has ether been a direct copy off somebody else, or they have bought out a company who makes the game.

    Farmville in point = Harvest Moon anybody?

    Investing in Zynga would be a big mistake.. with their numbers falling exponentially.. I believe investors would be a little worried about where they put their money. However Zynga has no problem raising money, as we’ve all found out.

  8. notJason says:

    @Jason You forget that Facebook is partly responsible for the decline in all social games. Facebook removed much of the free viral marketing that let to these insane number of players.

    Let me also explain something about innovation in games. There is not much of it but who cares. There is a limited number of topics you can create and market. for example, the new medal of honor is just like Battlefield 2, which is just like Modern Warefare 2. War.. everyone makes a game about it. Blur is just like GranTourismo, which is like Midnight Club. Everyone makes a racing game. Prince of persia and Assassins Creed sure look alike too. But who cares. Farmville is a take on a farming sim. so what. if the game is good and attracts millions of players, it must be doing something better than the game before it.

  9. Brian Boulnois says:

    As Jason says Zynga have grown from copying other peoples ideas are redressing there very own ideas with different theme after ie dragon wars, space wars, hero wars the list goes on. Of course people soon get bored of the same mission attack heal games and Zynga closed more of these types of games. Im suprised myself that Zynga is doing so well in all its current games its always spamming you to buy items via the countless boxs that spring up in front of you or gets you to spam your friends for help.

    In reality we are seeing is the social net bubble kind of like the net bubble of the late 90′s throwing vast amounts of money into start ups then that bubble bust and the fallout began with big ideas closing overnight as the the money rain out. Its a not a question of if but when this very bubble will bust on social networks and will Zynga still be around after the dust has settled.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Inside Social Games Sponsors
6waves Frima TinyCo Peak Games SocialClicks maudau Kontagent
Featured Company
Jobs of the Day

Northwestern University
Evanston, IL

TinyCo
San Francisco, CA

Squarespace
New York, NY

More Research & Information from Inside Facebook

Sign up for free email updates beyond today's news.

 

WebMediaBrands
Mediabistro | All Creative World | Inside Network
Jobs | Education | Research | Events | News
Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright 2012 WebMediaBrands Inc. All rights reserved.