<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game Design Lessons: Scrabble and Wordscraper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidesocialgames.com/2008/08/04/game-design-lessons-scrabble-and-wordscraper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidesocialgames.com/2008/08/04/game-design-lessons-scrabble-and-wordscraper/</link>
	<description>Tracking Innovation at the Convergence of Games and Social Platforms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:29:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidesocialgames.com/2008/08/04/game-design-lessons-scrabble-and-wordscraper/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidesocialgames.com/?p=402#comment-331</guid>
		<description>My goodness this blog has the most unreadble comment formatting I have ever scene. Tiny grey writing on a grey background? What&#039;s with that? Do they not want comments to be read?

I&#039;m glad that Wordscraper are taking my advice. ;-) I expected that they would make these changes. The question remains whether the design space is really rich enough to make it worthwhile. I suspect one good Scrabble board is much like another -- which is not to say that all boards are equally good, but that once you&#039;ve found one good board, another good board is unlikely to afford a substantially different game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My goodness this blog has the most unreadble comment formatting I have ever scene. Tiny grey writing on a grey background? What&#8217;s with that? Do they not want comments to be read?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that Wordscraper are taking my advice. <img src='http://www.insidesocialgames.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I expected that they would make these changes. The question remains whether the design space is really rich enough to make it worthwhile. I suspect one good Scrabble board is much like another &#8212; which is not to say that all boards are equally good, but that once you&#8217;ve found one good board, another good board is unlikely to afford a substantially different game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.insidesocialgames.com/2008/08/04/game-design-lessons-scrabble-and-wordscraper/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidesocialgames.com/?p=402#comment-326</guid>
		<description>They have already done point (2) you recommend.  Wordscraper is in a continuous redesign mode currently with lots of useful changes.  I suspect they may well do (1) soon.

They have added more parameters as you suggest.  Tile distribution and value are now changable.  I suspect they may allow variance in the size of board too.

I agree with your points on randomly generated boards.  I am considering writing a genetic algorithm to search the design space for good quality boards.

Barnaby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have already done point (2) you recommend.  Wordscraper is in a continuous redesign mode currently with lots of useful changes.  I suspect they may well do (1) soon.</p>
<p>They have added more parameters as you suggest.  Tile distribution and value are now changable.  I suspect they may allow variance in the size of board too.</p>
<p>I agree with your points on randomly generated boards.  I am considering writing a genetic algorithm to search the design space for good quality boards.</p>
<p>Barnaby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
